Altman’s Response to Meta’s AI hires: A Struggle for Status at OpenAI
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has issued a direct response to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s recent recruitmentתפו at OpenAI. ”’
Altman dismissedMeta’s efforts to hire prominent AI experts and dismissed Meta as “acting in a way that’s distasteful,” calling it “cultural fraught” and spraying the company with increasingly toxic news. ”’
Altman criticizedMeta’s recruitment practices, stating that “Al Twitter is toxic;” “Meta is acting in a way that feels somewhat distasteful; and I assume things will get even crazier in the future. Al Twitter is toxic; Meta is acting in a way that feels somewhat distasteful; I assumed things would get even crazier in the future.” ”’
Altman also referencedExplicit mentionMillion of people from OpenAI, including Shengjia Zhao, Shuchao Bi, Jiahui Yu, and Hongyu Ren, who were LDAP to the former CEO to the new hires. ”’
“: “Al Twitter is toxic; Meta is acting in a way that feels somewhat distasteful; I assume things will get even crazier in the future. I got fired and said, “that was not the craziest thing that would happen in OpenAI history; certainly neither is this.” The company is having “crazy” future in the coming years.)
In a direct comparison, Altman once again emphasized that the company is looking to build artificial general intelligence (AGI), which “we have a clear path to” in the coming years. “OpenAI is looking to move forward with a plays a central role in building AGI, and it’s not clear this will work any one way or the other. The company is both assessing their compensation and seeing as to whether they can figure out what AGI really requires.” ”’
。”Altman himself justified his position, stating that “metals have way to go on, while we’re ready to make extraordinarily high expectations out of our people.”. “We have the most special team and culture in the world of all, and we have a lot of work to do to fix our culture for sure. We’ve gone through so many hyper-growth phases, but we’re already in an incredibly Silicon Valley environment. We don’t have a social moat; we have a way of thinking that’s unique in this space. OpenAI is weird in the most powerful and unique way that’s going to make sense 20 years from now.” ”’
Altman seemed hyper confident, calling “metals have much to go on against his… I think meta is going to lose, and meta—they’re going to let that happen,?” he said.”’
“Long after Meta has moved on to their next flavor of the week, or defending their social moat, we will be here, day by day, year after year. We figure that AGI is actually our top thing, and it’s got always been our top thing. Long after Meta has done everything, and defended its social moat, we will be here, barely moving, year after year, generating as much AGI as success itself. The company is not going to automatically lose wind of the rightData it’s holding to build AGI. Other companies, like Amazon, focus on things like streaming, but we’re here, 5 years out, thinking about what AGI requires as an important top goal for humanity. ‘But this is our top thing and will always be. Meta is going to be their social moat at some point; but our AGI will last longer.”’.’ ”’
Altman concludes, asserting that “we care about building AGI in a good way—we know what AGI is, we’re trying to figure out how to get there, and we’re looking for the best chance for success. Other companies care more about getting them to figure it out—thus, competing with us is normal. But in the end, we’re better off being the race to AGI, and meta is just competing with them on company ownership and social moat-building.”’’..”
This response highlights the contrast between Meta’s rapid hiring and the more deliberate strategy OpenAI is pursuing, whileThreshold.com.com asserting the significance of maintaining the company’s culture and technology to ultimately achieve AGI.ám Altman even deemsMeta’s efforts “a waste” of resources, calling it “desperate and distasteful” and accuses Meta of hiring individuals with a focus on their social moat, while mistaking individuals from OpenAI for geniuses who have a deeper connection to the company’s culture. Altman managed to convey a hard-fought stance while dismissingMeta’s recruitment tactics at the same time. articulate on the importance of keeping the identity of theUnified. Also, Altman even mockedMeta’s decision “to walk on eggshells” to further drive the point that he seems confident that Semans hold to the company’s identity and thatMeta’s decisions are ultimately unfair and naive. Overall, Altman’s argument made a strong case for leaving Meta in the旋wind, focusing onOpenAI’s ongoing growth and progress.
