Anyone following electric vehicle news in the past several months may feel like they are watching a yo-yo: first one analyst will predict an EV boom, and then another analyst will predict an EV sales slowdown. However, despite the differences of opinion on short term sales, signs continue to point to long term sustained growth in EVs sales.
This trend is supported by the current global race for EV and battery cell production. One research analyst predicted EV sales to grow from 1.5 million units in 2018 to 10.79 million units in 2025. This provides a significant market opportunity for those companies and countries that can plan for the shift ahead.
The hot bed of electric vehicles has long been China, largely buoyed by generous government subsidies of EVs. As discussed in the Economist, China is betting big on EVs, and is eyeing the predicted decline in internal combustion engine sales as an opportunity to dominate future car sales through EVs. Beijing Electric Vehicle Co. is now the world’s No. 2 manufacturer of electric vehicles behind Tesla. China saw a 62% increase in EV sales in 2018.
Although the news in the last several months has proclaimed China as slashing EV subsidies, the truth is China is reallocating resources to globally expand. As previously discussed on this blog, China revised its generous domestic EV subsidies to reduce (and eventually phase out) subsidies on vehicles that go less than 150 km, and instead to focus more subsidies on vehicles with at least 400 km in range. This effect should increase China’s EV sales around the world by pushing Chinese manufacturers toward EVs that can ultimately be exported.
Now, as reported in Fortune, Germany is entering the EV race by betting on the electric car batteries that fuel this boom. Currently, Chinese firms sell the vast majority of global EV batteries. But last fall, the German government set aside 1 billion euros to support German manufacturing of battery cells, with a goal of 30% global market share by 2030. Germany is looking to leverage its automotive industry and chemical manufacturing expertise to catch up to Asian battery makers, and is now entertaining approximately 30 bids for the government aid.
And of course, no EV discussion is complete without discussing the biggest player in the market—Tesla. Although Tesla reported a 61% sales drop in the United States in the first quarter, Tesla Model 3 was the top selling luxury car in the United States in 2018. At least in part, the sales drop was due to logistical challenges, rather than a decrease in demand. Tesla’s executives remain optimistic about meeting the company’s projections for 2019. However, if the Untied States wants to remain competitive, it will need to focus on incentives to spur EV investment and production. Although certain tax incentives are already in place, a recent paper by Progressive Policy Institute proposes a framework to expand and improve tax credits for consumer purchases of EVs—not unlike the subsidies already used in China to spur growth in EVs there.
Who will win the global EV race remains to be seen. However, the long term outlook for EVs is almost universally acknowledged, and companies that invest in the industry stand to reap significant rewards.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.