Honorable Mentions: Near-Best Video Doorbells
Several video doorbells stood out during testing, narrowly missing a top recommendation. The Doro Hemma Doorbell, designed for seniors, offers simplified installation and operation, with a crisp 1440p resolution, local storage, and a loud ringer. Its user-friendly app includes a call forwarding feature to trusted contacts. While lacking advanced features like privacy zones, its reliable performance, two-way audio, and zoom functionality make it a strong contender for its target demographic. The SimpliSafe Video Doorbell Pro integrates seamlessly with SimpliSafe security systems. Delivering swift alerts and a clear 1080p view with HDR, it requires a subscription for video recording but offers professional monitoring, a unique feature for doorbells. The Ring Battery Video Doorbell Pro, Ring’s premium battery-powered option, boasts high-quality video with HDR and color night vision. Swift notifications, multiple motion zones, and preroll capture enhance its functionality. While a subscription is required for video storage, it offers a generous 180-day history. However, battery life falls short of expectations. The TP-Link Tapo (D230S1) presents a compelling subscription-free option with local storage. It delivers excellent video quality, including nighttime performance, and includes a chime-integrated indoor hub. While the physical size and inconsistent AI performance are drawbacks, its local storage capability sets it apart.
Disappointing Doorbells: Not Recommended
Unfortunately, some tested doorbells failed to impress. The Reolink Video Doorbell (Battery) suffered from several shortcomings, including a low frame rate, lack of HDR, and a non-removable battery with disappointing longevity. Added to the mix are a confusing app and connectivity glitches, making it difficult to recommend. The Ezviz EP3x Pro, while aesthetically pleasing and boasting solar panel compatibility, lacks HDR and has unreliable human detection. Additionally, alert delivery issues on Android devices hinder its usability. The Botslab Video Doorbell 2 Pro presented challenges from the outset, with a difficult setup and low-quality screws. Though it offers versatile viewing options and local storage, its confusing app, lack of 2FA, and relatively high price outweigh its merits. The Wyze Video Doorbell Pro, formerly a budget recommendation, requires a subscription for essential features and has suffered from security breaches that cast doubt on its reliability. The Swann SwannBuddy Video Doorbell offers a wireless chime and local storage, but its poor video quality, slow app, and unreliable motion detection make it a poor choice. The Ezviz DB2, although offering decent video quality and a plug-in chime, suffers from bulky design, overexposed footage in sunlight, limited motion zones, and below-average battery life.
Detailed Look at Honorable Mentions
The Doro Hemma stands out for its senior-focused simplicity. Its clear video, local storage, and straightforward app offer peace of mind for users who may not want advanced features. The call-forwarding option allows family members to assist if needed. For SimpliSafe users, the Video Doorbell Pro integrates seamlessly, adding a layer of security to their existing system. Its reliable performance and optional professional monitoring make it a strong contender for those seeking complete home security. Ring’s Battery Video Doorbell Pro offers advanced features like HDR, color night vision, and multiple motion zones, providing a detailed view of your entrance. The preroll feature adds valuable context to recordings. The TP-Link Tapo caters to privacy-conscious users with its local storage option, eliminating the need for a subscription. Its impressive video quality, both day and night, further enhances its appeal.
Detailed Look at Disappointing Doorbells
The Reolink’s low frame rate and lack of HDR make for a subpar viewing experience. The short battery life combined with the non-removable battery further diminishes its value. The Ezviz EP3x Pro’s inconsistent human detection and Android alert issues undermine its reliability. The Botslab’s difficult setup and questionable build quality, along with its confusing app, make it a frustrating choice. The Wyze, while previously a budget-friendly option, has lost credibility due to security concerns, making it difficult to endorse. The Swann’s poor video quality and unreliable performance eliminate it from contention. The Ezviz DB2’s design flaws, limited motion zone customization, and battery issues overshadow its positive features.
Key Features and Considerations
Consider these key factors when selecting a video doorbell: video quality, reliability, battery life (for battery-powered models), storage options (local or cloud), additional features (like HDR, preroll, and person detection), and app interface. Security and privacy considerations are also paramount, especially in light of past breaches. Finally, consider your budget and whether a subscription is required for essential features.
Subscription vs. No Subscription
Some doorbells require subscriptions for cloud storage and advanced features, while others offer local storage via microSD card. Consider your needs and budget when deciding whether a subscription is worthwhile. Local storage avoids recurring fees but may be less secure if the doorbell is stolen. Cloud storage offers convenience and accessibility but comes with a monthly or yearly cost.
Integration with Existing Systems
If you have an existing smart home or security system, compatibility with your video doorbell is crucial. The SimpliSafe Video Doorbell Pro exemplifies this, integrating seamlessly with SimpliSafe systems.
Specific Use Cases
The Doro Hemma specifically targets seniors with its simplified interface and call-forwarding feature, demonstrating how specific needs can be addressed. Similarly, users living on busy streets may prioritize adjustable motion zones to minimize false alerts.
