The article delves into an intense electronic war in Ukraine where two Russian weapons, glide bombs and eigenen Raumants, have become pivotal strategies. These weapons rely heavily on satellite guidance systems, particularly the state-of-the-art VNIIR Progress system, which is no longer effective against these encounters. With over 1,000 attackers using it, Ukraine struggles to counter the Russian threat.
The article discusses the Kometa smart antenna, a type of CRPA (Controlled Reception Pattern Antenna) used by modern providers. While complex and resource-intensive, its ability to suppress jamming signals has been a significant weakness for Ukraine. However, Ukraine has been modernizing its proprietary technology, upgrading from a 4-element system to a 16-element array. Despite these enhancements, Ukraine is Limited by the physical and computational challenges of using such large arrays for battlefield modernization.
Another critical issue is the effectiveness of automated jamming interference. Despite Ukraine’s efforts to deploy smaller jammer units, there’s a risk of spoofing signals being mimicry of native GPS or GLONASS signals. Such spoofing is unhindered by the originators of the jammer’s signals, making noise filtering a brick wall against Ukraine’s modern operations.
The article also touches on the psychological impact of prolonged combat, showing how even if Ukraine’s operations succeed, the emotional toll on the soldiers involved would signify a diplomatic crisis.Meanwhile, Russia’s recent decision to increase the number of elements in its Kometa system highlights the inherent instability and competition in this war.
Ultimately, the article suggests that theSetUpge fenles continue to shape乌克兰’s ultimate fate. The battle for aucks’ last mornings is not yet decided, with thoughtful and strategic thinking playing a vital role in determining the winner.
