GM’s Planned Cuts Require Action by Its Suppliers


In the face of what General Motors’ CEO Mary Barra calls a “fast-changing market,” this week General Motors announced its plans to end the production of certain vehicles, reduce its North American work force by more than 10%, and idle five plants in the United States and Canada. General Motors also announced that it plans to cease operations at two additional (but not yet identified) plants outside of North America by the end of 2019. The moves are intended to save General Motors $6 billion by the end of 2020. While the market reacted positively to the news — shares in General Motors were up 4.8% to close at their highest closing price in recent months — this action by General Motors will no doubt have an impact on its suppliers, as well as sub-suppliers within its supply chain.

Barra made the announcement Monday, which was followed later that day by a “Supplier Notice” sent by General Motors to its many suppliers. In that communication, General Motors said that it was “continuing to take proactive steps to strengthen our overall business performance and become more agile, resilient and profitable, while the company and economy are still strong.” In order to do that, the company plans to align its manufacturing capacity with market demand. This action by General Motors comes in the face of a slow-down in new car sales, shifts in consumer demand for pickup trucks and sport utilities instead of smaller vehicles, and increased focus by General Motors on electric vehicles and self-driving technology. “In addition to dealing with capacity and leverage challenges, we are expecting suppliers to face a softening of volumes over the next 18 months. Furthermore, transformation of the existing production capabilities to those suited for alternative vehicles will be a key challenge,” according to Laura Marcero, industrial practice leader and head of the Detroit office for Huron Consulting Group.

Approximately 3,300 production workers in the United States, and approximately 2,500 production workers in Canada, are expected to be affected. In addition, General Motors plans to reduce its salaried staff by approximately 8,000 (only 2,250 of its white collar workers recently accepted a voluntary buyout, so additional cuts must be made to reach the 8,000 target). By the end of 2019, General Motors plans to idle three assembly plants — Detroit-Hamtramck, Lordstown (Ohio), and Oshawa (Ontario). In addition, General Motors plans to idle two propulsion plants — Baltimore Operations (Maryland) and Warren Transmission Operations (Michigan).

General Motors’ announcement to its suppliers includes the following specifics regarding affected programs and end of production dates:

Detroit Hamtramck Assembly* March 1, 2019
June 1, 2019
Buick LaCrosse, Chevrolet Volt

Cadillac CT6 and Impala
*Staggered approach

Lordstown Assembly March 1, 2019 Chevrolet Cruze
Oshawa Assembly Q4 2019 Chevrolet Impala and Cadillac XTS
Previous gen Silverado/Sierra (K2 Trucks)
Warren Transmission August 1, 2019 6-speed transmissions (for XTS,
Impala, Malibu, Volt, Acadia) and
the Global Front Wheel Electric (GFE)
(for Volt)
Baltimore Operations April 1, 2019 Full-size pickup transmissions
(T1 and K2)
Note: (Other impacted locations; but these plants will continue operations)
Ramos March 1, 2019 Discontinue Cruze hatchback production
for U.S. Market
Brownstown March 1, 2019 Lithium-Ion Battery for Volt: plant will
continue to build other products but
will see significant downside volume impact

Importantly for suppliers, General Motors announced that any “applicable claims” should be submitted within 90 days. These include termination and due diligence claims, and obsolescence or prototype. For example, termination claims apply where a supplier has not yet shipped parts to General Motors but has incurred development costs. Due diligence claims involve suppliers affected by the acceleration of volumes and the end date for production. Both allow suppliers to pursue recovery of certain development costs such as tooling and ED&D. Suppliers also may submit obsolescence claims to recover for inventory and WIP through General Motors’ standard procedures for submitting an obsolescence claim.

General Motors’ requirements for the submission of claims are extensive, and may be subject to specific terms of the supplier’s contract with General Motors. Suppliers also should review their agreements with affected sub-tier and material suppliers to ensure compliance with any notice and termination requirements, as well as other obligations such as union contracts, leases, and other contracts that may be impacted by the closures.  The resolution of submitted claims is often the result of extensive negotiations between General Motors, its suppliers, and affected sub-suppliers.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here